A letter from the editor: On the topic of going coed

Last year, when Esther Barazzone, president of Chatham University, announced that the Board of Trustees was considering going coeducational, there was outrage and heartbreak and confusion. There was a flood of complaints and protests. Friends and colleagues were torn apart by differing opinions.

As a journalist, I have an inherent excitement that comes with big news. This was the biggest news of my Chatham generation—and also just the biggest news in years. Chatham was about to be in headlines everywhere and I could not have been more eager to be at the center of it.

However, that does not mean that the announcement did not rattle or upset me.

I never had any particular interest in women’s colleges. That is not what drew me to Chatham at all. But after being here for a while, I had changed my mind. I had never felt safer walking alone at night. I loved that I could walk from the theater to Fickes at midnight, and not be afraid that somebody might assault me in the dark. I loved that I could be part of a learning environment where my opinion was always valued and seen as equally important.

When President Barazzone made this announcement, I felt betrayed. I felt that I had signed up for four years at a women’s college, and this was a breach of contract. They had promised me that experience for four years, and instead I would only get two.

Being at a women’s college had changed me. If I told my pre-Chatham self all of the things I could accomplish after finding my voice at Chatham, the old me never would have believed it.

I was afraid that bringing more men onto campus would snuff out my voice, and the voices of my fellow Chatham women. I had fears that they would come tearing onto campus and demand leadership positions—or take them by force. The thought of losing the Communiqué terrified me. I had put my heart and soul into this paper, and by my junior year, a man could rip it from my hands.

But we cannot lose our voices. We cannot let them quiet us. Feminism is not the idea that women should be more important than men—it is the idea that we are all equal and deserve equal opportunities.

I am a feminist.

Chatham has always been a place where feminists could find justice, and there is no reason why it should not continue to stay that way. The introduction of men should never stop us from fighting for equality; fighting for things like equal pay and respect.

Although I sincerely wish that Chatham would take more time with the transition to make sure that it goes more smoothly, I understand the time crunch. And I agree that I would rather see Chatham transform than disappear.

My hope is that in the big picture of things, Chatham will never change. We may introduce men, but they will be feminists. I hope that Chatham will remain a unique environment: a coed campus that is still safe, a school that makes an effort to teach feminism in everything it does, and a school that fosters empowered women no matter the circumstances.

Chatham may be changing, but my only concern at this point is that Chatham maintains its dignity and history. Just because men are coming does not mean that we can no longer be a proponent for change and equality. We have an incredible opportunity to educate men, and we cannot be afraid to take that first step.

Rest in peace, net neutrality

Net neutrality is dead and Tom Wheeler killed it.

Since 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been in proceedings to discuss the issue of network neutrality–the principle that Internet Service Providers must treat all electronic data equally, without discrimination or different charges based on user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication.

Corporations involved in the issue tend to lean towards the side of internet fast lanes–charging users more to use certain sites–and other methods of restricting the internet in violation of current net neutrality doctrine, which is covered by common carrier regulations.

Common carrier regulations are a previous FCC ruling that forced phone companies to treat all calls equally or without preference. Until September 10, 2014, communications providers were forced to treat the internet under common carrier regulations.

As the FCC has struck down prior rulings–one as recent as last year (“Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission”)–on net neutrality with this new decision, drastic changes may be coming. The internet, predictably, did not respond well to the news of these happenings.

Over the course of the last year, internet users have broken the FCC website twice with the sheer volume of complaints filed on the subject of net neutrality.  Figures as recent as September 10 put the number of complaints in the area of 3.7 million.

Due to the volume of complaints, the original comment period of five months that the FCC had opened had to be extended for over a week due to server latency issues.  On September 10, over 220,000 complaints were registered on the site over the course of the day. The average number of calls to the FCC during the Day of Action was around 1,000 calls per minute.

Contributing actions in favor of continued net neutrality and the volume of complaints issued to the FCC were internet-wide blackouts and server slow-downs by various sites, including Tumblr, Netflix, Reddit, and other sources–including a widely viewed segment by John Oliver from “Last Week Tonight.”

One of the possible outcomes from this decision is that last year’s victory over Comcast–in which the company’s merger with Time Warner was only approved if they agreed to maintain net neutrality until 2018–may no longer be enforceable.

Comcast has since joined Team Cable, which comprises of Verizon, Time Warner, and AT&T; coincidentally, these are some of the most reviled companies in the United States.

However, this may not be the outcome as there does exist the grandfather clause in their original agreement on the Comcast-Time Warner merger wherein they will have to protect network neutrality for their users until 2018, barring renegotiation with the FCC.

Despite the rulings and possible outcomes of the rulings, organizations like Free Press and Battle for the Net are still running active campaigns and organizing petitions to keep the net neutral. Battle for the Net currently hosts downloadable code to make an artificial slowdown on websites and blogs, with links to more information.

It is still possible to crash the FCC servers and tie up their phone lines to express your displeasure with their ruling on net neutrality.

For Internet complaints, visit www.fcc.gov/comments.

For phone complaints, call 1-888-225-5322 or 1-888-835-5322.

 

Why “Divergent” and “The Hunger Games” are not the same

Since the movie adaptation of the book “Divergent” was released a couple of weeks ago it has gotten a lot of comparisons to “The Hunger Games”. Some critics even slammed the movie, saying that it was too similar to it’s sister franchise. However, there actually isn’t much similarity between the two books & films at all.

The only two similarities are that they are both dystopian novels with female protagonists. That is where the similarities begin and end. In “The Hunger Games”, other than the games themselves, the main focus is on the love triangle between Katniss, Peeta, and Gale. It’s all about whom she will choose in the end. “Divergent” does not have a love triangle. Tris’ love interest is Four, her instructor during her initiation to the Dauntless faction.

In “The Hunger Games”, the city of Panem is divided into 12 districts and the higher number district, the worse off those citizens are. While in “Divergent”, the backdrop is Chicago and factions divide the people based on an aptitude test that every citizen takes when they are 16. After the test, there is a choosing ceremony and you can choose to stay in the faction that you’re already in or go to another one. The five factions are Abnegation, Amity, Candor, Dauntless, and Erudite. These factions are based on personality traits and values.

Personally, I feel that the comparisons are too soon and ridiculous. I mean how many vampire movies have we had to endure since “Twilight” came out almost six years ago? Yes, I’ve heard some complaining about that, but not as much as now. I think that audiences should be able to enjoy both series without comparing them so harshly. Let’s just be happy that two strong and positive female characters are leading these successful movies.

 

Foodie on the Half Shell: Happy birthday! Here’s some Shiro Wot.

By: Olivia Beals

On a Monday night on Baum Boulevard, the streets are quiet. Not much is going on, and maybe you’re hungry but not sure what to do about the issue. Well, look over to that blue and silver sign. Tana, it reads. The windows are glowing with a welcoming light and red spots of empty napkins are sitting atop the many tables inside. What does it all mean? I was wondering the same thing this week as I was guided blindly into the building.

My birthday was last weekend, and I enjoy special treatment and attention maybe more than the average soul. I love surprises and acts of kindness. My boyfriend was in charge of the day’s festivities, and I will tell you—that man can deliver. He knows my love for adventurous food, and he knows that it is such a big part of my life. I knew he had a special surprise for our dinner plans, and I was so excited when I discovered we had arrived at an Ethiopian restaurant. Some of the most interesting and spice filled goodies I have ever eaten! I knew as soon as I walked in, good or bad, I must write about my experience.

The restaurant is clean and quiet. I was concerned that we would be the only ones in the entire restaurant, but I was pleased to see three other couples dining out. If you have any kind of business on a Monday night, especially with international cuisine, then you’re probably in the green. The menu is small, but straight-forward.

They have an array of appetizers and lentil soups that looked extremely tasty, and they also have entrees and sample meals. I went for the sample meal. You can pick five of the entrees, vegetarian, or meat, and it will all come out on top of this fantastic spongy flat bread. The idea is to eat with your hands by scooping up the different sauces and lentils with the bread. As I said, the bread is nice and spongy, so that it does not get soggy with all of the juices of the wat (stew).

We ordered off of the vegetarian menu and ate some lentils, peas, collard greens, and ground chickpeas. We were a fan of almost all of them. My favorite was the Ye ater Kik Alicha, which was a mix of split peas and onion. It was so fragrant and soft. My boyfriend’s favorite was Shiro Wot, which was a stew of ground chick peas and spices.

They leave their spices a little vague, so I have been looking for answers to what they are. Mostly I have only found chili pepper and ginger. I know there is more to it, though. The taste is so complex and special. None of their dishes taste similar, so you have a nice diversity of tastes in front of you. To top it all off, this menu is so healthy. It has your veggies, protein, and meats. It’s so low in fat and just so wholesome. You really can’t go wrong when it comes to their entrees.

I recommend Tana to anyone for lunch or dinner. The service is nice, and they always keep your drinks full. They also have a liquor license with a full bar. I was really impressed with their stock. Come ready to dig in with your hands (no acrylics allowed), and to get a mouthful of zingy spices. International food is fun and broadens your taste. It also can lead you into new ideas for healthier and exciting cooking. Check it out! I can guarantee a great meal and an experience we all should take a bite of.